In modern work culture, certain formats dominate how knowledge is shared: the live presentation, often delivered in person or on video calls, and the webinar, typically conducted online for larger audiences. They follow a similar formula. A speaker guides the audience through a series of slides, elaborating on bullet points while trying to keep things lively. In the room, participants may nod or take notes. In the online space, viewers leave comments in the chat box, react with emojis, and sometimes multitask in silence. The session is usually recorded, transcribed, and shared. But after all the motion, what remains? What ideas actually stay with us, get reused, or built upon? Too often, very little.
These formats create a kind of performance loop. Slide decks, filled with brief phrases and aesthetic embellishments, are expected to hold attention while signaling professionalism. Webinars strive to appear engaging but rarely deliver material that survives beyond the event. The production value often exceeds the informational value. Rather than cultivating shared understanding, these sessions encourage a routine of content consumption that mimics engagement without truly demanding thought.
What is quietly forgotten in all this is the form that has always carried humanity’s best thinking: descriptive, narrative prose. Whether it appears in the form of essays, articles, or books, it is the structure through which ideas are developed, tested, and refined. The greatest scientific theories, philosophical breakthroughs, and literary masterpieces were not introduced as bullet points. They were written. They were read. They were revised, interpreted, and debated over time. Even in fields where performance or presentation is involved, such as music, architecture, or product design, the deeper conceptual framework is recorded and preserved in written form.
In this light, everything else, slides, talks, videos, transcripts, is dressing. Helpful in some cases, but secondary. Nobody is satisfied with comprehending or appreciating Newton’s Principia, Darwin’s Origin of Species, or Arendt’s The Human Condition through a PowerPoint version. It would be absurd to try. The bullet point presentation may assist, but it cannot replace the depth or nuance of a well-structured narrative. And yet, in modern corporate and institutional settings, we often act as though that replacement is acceptable.
Amazon’s Quiet Rebellion
At Amazon, a different approach has been quietly practiced for years. Under Jeff Bezos’ leadership, the company abandoned slide decks in favor of narrative memos. In high-level meetings, participants do not sit through a PowerPoint presentation. They begin by reading a six-page memo in silence. Only after that does the discussion begin.
This shift was not arbitrary. Bezos recognized that writing forces better thinking. When ideas must be explained in full sentences and paragraphs, the writer has no choice but to clarify their reasoning. Trade-offs must be addressed. Weak points cannot be glossed over with bold fonts or flashy graphics. The result is not just clearer communication, but better decision-making.
Bezos was influenced by thinkers like Edward Tufte, who famously criticized PowerPoint for its tendency to obscure rather than clarify. Tufte’s work showed how poor visual structures can conceal important information and weaken arguments. In one of his most well-known claims, he argued that PowerPoint contributed to the Columbia space shuttle disaster by hiding key engineering warnings in poorly structured slides.
The practice of silent reading at the start of Amazon meetings also serves a purpose. It ensures that everyone engages with the same source material. It eliminates the distractions of performance and levels the playing field. What matters is not who speaks loudest or designs best, but whose ideas are most coherent.
The Limitations of Slides and Webinars
There is a persistent belief that slides are efficient and that webinars are engaging. But both formats, as commonly used, often fall short. Bullet points encourage abbreviated thinking. They strip away context and flatten complexity. A good idea, when reduced to a few phrases on a slide, can lose its meaning entirely.
Similarly, webinars are often treated as knowledge-sharing events, yet their format discourages careful analysis. Speakers rely on speech, which is by nature ephemeral. The audience is passive, rarely involved in shaping the content. The content itself is hard to revisit meaningfully. Transcripts may exist, but they are rarely written with clarity or purpose in mind. Watching an hour-long recording to extract a single useful insight is an exercise in futility.
Even worse, these formats create a cycle of busywork. Hours are spent designing slides, rehearsing presentations, hosting virtual events, managing chat discussions, and sending follow-up emails. But at the end of it all, what remains? Often, nothing more than a vague memory and a forgotten link to a recording no one replays.
Returning to the Narrative Core
What is missing in all this noise is the quiet strength of structured writing. There is something fundamentally honest about a paragraph. It does not hide behind animation or aesthetics. It lives or dies by its clarity. It forces the author to think through implications, anticipate objections, and organize thoughts with care.
A text-based, narrative-first approach puts content back at the center of knowledge work. Markdown files, plain-text documents, or structured memos become the primary format. These are not decorative. They are functional, searchable, versioned, and shareable. They invite reading rather than watching. They are easy to update and easy to transform.
With a well-written base document, other forms can be generated as needed. If a presentation is required, one can be produced from the original text. If an executive summary is useful, AI can extract it. If a podcast-style recording helps reach a different audience, it can be created from the same material. But the starting point remains the same: a clear and thoughtful expression of ideas in words.
This inversion of the traditional workflow is powerful. Rather than producing slides and then writing the memo after the fact, we begin with the real thinking. We then adapt it, if necessary, to different contexts. This saves time, reduces redundancy, and honors the value of reflection.
How AI Supports, Not Replaces, the Writer
This model is especially powerful when paired with AI. Large language models excel at working with structured narrative content. They can summarize, adapt, translate, or reformat text in ways that make it useful across many contexts. But they need something solid to start with. They cannot perform miracles with scattered bullets or screenshots.
When the core content is structured and expressive, AI becomes an amplifier. It can create slide outlines, audio scripts, short videos, or targeted summaries. It can extract key points or generate questions for further discussion. But it is not a substitute for thinking. It is a partner in making that thinking more visible and more accessible.
AI also benefits from text formats that are clean, semantic, and versioned. A markdown document, unlike a PDF or slide deck, can be parsed easily, interpreted accurately, and reused flexibly. It can be connected to other documents, cross-referenced, and maintained as part of a living knowledge base.
Rather than relying on a single presentation to carry the weight of an idea, we can now maintain a durable, updatable, and AI-compatible foundation. From there, all other forms of communication flow naturally.
Avoiding the Work That Pretends to Be Work
This approach also challenges the rise of what David Graeber called “bullshit jobs.” Many people in modern organizations spend their time creating documents that look impressive but contain little substance. Endless revisions of slide decks. Rehearsals for webinars. Reports that are written for appearance, not use.
These efforts are often justified by internal politics, managerial expectations, or the need to “show progress.” But they do not produce knowledge. They do not create value that lasts. They give the illusion of productivity while draining time and energy from more meaningful work.
Webinars, in particular, often fall into this trap. They are promoted, scheduled, rehearsed, delivered, and archived; all for an event that may communicate less than a two-page memo. Participants praise the speaker, thank the organizers, and move on, rarely revisiting the content. The experience is social, but not substantive.
By shifting the focus back to written, structured thought, we escape this cycle. We stop performing productivity and start practicing it. We create artifacts that matter; the documents that can be read, reused, and built upon. We stop chasing attention and start building understanding.
A More Humane Future of Knowledge Work
The heart of this movement is not efficiency alone. It is a kind of respect, for time, for intelligence, for clarity. When we share ideas in writing, we invite others to meet us in silence. We allow space for disagreement, revision, and reconsideration. We treat our colleagues not as spectators, but as thinkers.
This also supports more inclusive collaboration. Not everyone is a charismatic speaker. Not everyone thrives in live discussions. But everyone can read. Everyone can write. A narrative-first model makes room for quiet voices, careful thinkers, and asynchronous participation. It breaks the dependence on personality and places the focus on ideas.
In returning to narrative prose, we are not inventing something new. We are honoring a tradition as old as thought itself. From ancient scrolls to modern books, from sacred texts to scientific treatises, our most enduring ideas have lived through language. The clarity of a sentence, the arc of an argument, the precision of a paragraph; these have always been the vehicles of real understanding.
All other forms, the slides, the talks, the transcripts, serve only as reflections, not sources. They may help introduce or support an idea, but they are never the idea itself. That always lives in the text. And as we move into a world shaped by AI and digital tools, returning to this core is not nostalgia. It is survival. It is the one way we ensure that knowledge does not just move faster, but moves truthfully and meaningfully.
Image by Kerttu
Tom’s Blog 