In modern organizations, the appearance of professionalism often overshadows the substance of work. A polished slide deck, a perfectly aligned chart, or a branded report gives the impression of rigor and intelligence. Meetings begin with the lights dimmed, the screen bright, and the room silent in admiration of design. Yet, the feeling of weight and importance often evaporates once the content is stripped of its presentation.
When you read the same keynote speech as plain text, the glamour fades. What once seemed profound in a hall full of music, animation, and applause may reveal itself as a collection of generic phrases. The authority came from the container, not the content. Inside organizations, this pattern repeats itself daily. Countless hours go into crafting documents that are visually appealing but intellectually thin. Teams feel productive because they produce artifacts that look like work, even if the thinking behind them is shallow.
This illusion has a psychological pull. Humans like to see the visible product of their labor. A slide with perfect alignment and color gives satisfaction that a simple paragraph in plain text does not. The tragedy is that the satisfaction is often disconnected from the actual value created. Professionalism is measured by how things look, not by how clear or useful the knowledge truly is.
Content and Container
At the heart of this problem lies a confusion between the content and the container. Content is knowledge: the insights, reasoning, evidence, and decisions that allow an organization to act wisely. Container is the visual or structural wrapper that holds the content: the formatting, templates, and design that make it presentable.
Tools like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint were designed to give both content and container in one place. Over time, organizations grew to judge the container as much as, if not more than, the content. A simple paragraph with sharp reasoning is ignored, while a beautifully designed deck full of vague statements receives applause. Even internal emails, chat apps, and video calls carry this bias. When something looks busy or full, it is perceived as important.
The cost is enormous. Employees spend hours adjusting margins, resizing images, and decorating tables. Knowledge work is supposed to be thinking, analyzing, and deciding. Yet much of what passes for knowledge work is cosmetic maintenance of the container. People stay late not because ideas take time, but because formatting does.
The Weight of Legacy Tools
The dominance of office tools has a long history. Word processed text, Excel handled calculations, and PowerPoint became the stage for ideas. Together, they formed the ritual of corporate communication. For decades, this system worked because alternatives were scarce. Sending a memo or a deck was the only way to circulate thought at scale.
Over time, these tools began to define the culture of work itself. The metric of contribution became the artifact. The more slides you produced, the more visible your effort. Meetings turned into performances where the slide deck became the star, not the argument behind it. Teams began producing for the sake of visibility rather than for the sake of clarity.
This legacy weighs heavily on modern organizations. It shapes habits, evaluation, and even the sense of identity at work. People have been trained to feel that a day spent formatting a slide is a day well spent, because the slide is visible proof of effort. Yet in truth, much of that effort is performative productivity. It consumes time without strengthening the collective intelligence of the organization.
The Case for Text-First Knowledge
A better path begins by separating the source of knowledge from the presentation of knowledge. When content is written first in plain, durable formats, the focus returns to thinking. Markdown for narrative text, CSV for tables, and simple text-based diagram descriptions provide a foundation that is light, flexible, and honest.
Text-first knowledge forces a confrontation with the core of an idea. A short note that explains the insight or decision without decoration will immediately reveal if the content is weak. A blog entry or an internal note can carry more weight than thirty decorated slides because it does not hide behind cosmetic effort. When an organization learns to value these plain narratives, it begins to shed the illusion that beauty equals intelligence.
Another benefit of text-first content is durability. Plain text and lightweight formats survive across tools and time. They are easy to search, version, and convert into other formats. A report written in Markdown can become a PDF, a web page, or a slide deck automatically. The knowledge remains alive, and the container can be regenerated as needed.
AI as the Great Liberator
The arrival of AI changes the equation. Formatting, which once demanded human hours, can now be generated in minutes. A well-structured text document can become a polished slide deck or a branded PDF without manual labor. Charts can be generated from CSV data automatically, and reports can gain visual consistency without human intervention.
This liberation means employees can remain in the content zone. They can focus on analysis, reasoning, and storytelling, knowing that AI can handle the final decoration for stakeholders who need visual polish. A memo becomes the single source of truth. Everything else, from slides to emails to dashboards, becomes an output generated from that source.
AI also exposes how much time was previously wasted on unnecessary labor. When a task that used to take hours now takes seconds, it becomes clear that much of “knowledge work” was really formatting work. Organizations can now redirect that energy to reflection, experimentation, and decision-making.
AI as a Thinking Partner for Text-First Work
The real potential of separating content and container is not only efficiency, but also deep collaboration with AI. Text-first, structured content is naturally compatible with AI because it is machine-readable, unburdened by cosmetic noise, and semantically clear.
When knowledge lives as a paragraph, a table, or a structured narrative, AI can read it directly. It can ask questions back, highlight inconsistencies, suggest deeper analysis, and even simulate decision scenarios. A messy PowerPoint deck full of diagrams and screenshots is opaque to machines. A Markdown file with a clear narrative and a CSV table is alive to AI.
This compatibility transforms AI from a passive assistant into an active collaborator. Instead of asking AI to summarize slides or extract numbers from screenshots, we can engage in a true dialogue of ideas. We can prompt AI to challenge assumptions, compare historical data, and test logical consistency. The collaboration becomes a cycle: humans generate insight, AI deepens it, and the organization makes better decisions.
Text-first knowledge is not only easier for humans to read but also easier for machines to reason about. As AI continues to advance, organizations that adopt this approach will find themselves with living knowledge ecosystems, where ideas are not only recorded but continuously enriched by automated thinking partners.
Cultural Shift and the Future of Work
The challenge is not only technical but cultural. Moving away from heavy office artifacts requires changing how organizations perceive effort and status. A polished slide is often a political signal. It says, “I worked hard.” Replacing it with a plain narrative can feel risky in a culture that rewards appearance over substance.
Cultural change comes from leadership and habit. When managers start asking for text-based narratives instead of decks, teams adapt. When meetings shift from slide reviews to text discussions, people learn to read for meaning rather than scan for visuals. Over time, the social prestige of decorating slides fades, and the prestige of clarity and insight rises.
This cultural shift also aligns with the rhythms of modern work. Knowledge workers are overwhelmed by dense webinars, long emails, and endless notifications. A concise, text-first update respects their attention. AI-generated outputs can satisfy those who still want a deck or a chart without forcing everyone to spend hours in production mode.
A Lighter, Clearer Knowledge Culture
Imagine an organization that embraces this new approach. Most internal communication happens as text-based narratives and structured data. Meetings begin with reading and discussion, not with performing. Decisions are captured as plain text records, and anyone can see the reasoning without hunting through slides. Data tables live in one source, and every chart in a report is generated from it.
AI serves as both the decorator and the collaborator. It generates polished reports for external consumption and also acts as a reviewer, analyst, and scenario tester for the internal team. Knowledge flows are light, clear, and conversational. Employees spend their energy on understanding and deciding, while AI ensures that outputs can be produced in any container the audience needs.
This lighter culture restores the essence of knowledge work. Work is no longer a performance for software interfaces but a contribution to collective understanding. People spend less time proving they are busy and more time creating clarity. Over time, the organization becomes both faster and more thoughtful because knowledge is no longer trapped in heavy containers and is now enhanced by intelligent dialogue with AI.
The Enduring Voice of Plain Text
A beautiful slide can impress the eye, but truth lives in the sentence that survives without it. Knowledge that cannot stand as plain text is fragile. Knowledge that is clear and precise in any container is enduring.
The promise of AI is not to flood organizations with more polished slides, but to remove the walls between thought, collaboration, and expression. When content and container are separated, work becomes lighter, more honest, and more powerful. AI handles the decoration, partners in the reasoning, and leaves humans free to focus on the one thing that truly matters: thinking well.
Image by Pixabay
Tom’s Blog 