We live in a time when everyone seems to be pushed toward taking sides. Every event, every statement, and every silence is interpreted as a declaration of identity or allegiance. The public sphere is no longer just a place for dialogue. It has become a stage for performance, a constant test of loyalty to one’s chosen tribe. The atmosphere is charged with urgency. It feels as if to hesitate, or to refuse to join the chorus of outrage, is to be seen as complicit.
The internet, which was once imagined as a tool for connection, has evolved into a battlefield of narratives. Social media platforms amplify division, rewarding quick reactions and emotional extremes. The dopamine rush of being liked, shared, or cheered on by one’s peers feeds a cycle of constant engagement. What began as a technology to bring people closer has often left them more polarized and isolated, each locked in a digital echo chamber.
There is also a strange excitement in this tribal energy. People are not only arguing. They are enjoying the performance of identity, the thrill of belonging to a cause or community, the adrenaline of conflict. Yet beneath the surface, there is a fatigue that many are reluctant to name. It is exhausting to live in a constant state of reaction, where silence is misread as weakness and disagreement is treated as betrayal. Something essential is being lost in this noise: the ability to see the whole picture and to listen without rushing to judgment.
A Spiritual and Philosophical Gesture
In such a climate, the idea of stepping back might sound like disengagement or apathy. But stepping back, in the deepest sense, is neither neutral nor passive. It is a deliberate act of making space for the whole, of seeing beyond the narrow lens of tribal identity. It is not about abandoning commitment, but about committing to something larger than any single faction.
This posture has long been honored in spiritual traditions. In Taoism, there is the principle of wu wei, which is not laziness but a way of moving in harmony with the unfolding of life. It is an attitude of patience and alignment, where one does not force outcomes but allows things to reveal their natural shape. Stepping back, in this sense, is a way of participating more deeply by not clinging too tightly to control or ideology.
In Buddhism, especially in Zen, stepping back is closely related to the practice of seeing without attachment. Dōgen, the thirteenth-century Zen master, wrote that to study the self is to forget the self, and to forget the self is to be affirmed by all things. This forgetting is not a loss of identity but a release of the ego’s grip, a return to a wider field of awareness. It is only by stepping back from our own fixed narratives that we can see the interconnectedness of all things.
Philosophers like Simone Weil have also pointed to the moral power of attention. To truly attend to another person, to a situation, or even to oneself, requires a suspension of ego and preconception. Attention begins with stepping back, with creating a space where things can be seen as they are, not as we wish them to be. In a world where performance often overshadows presence, this kind of spaciousness is both rare and revolutionary.
Why We Cling to Tribes
If stepping back offers wholeness and clarity, why do so few people practice it? The answer lies partly in our deep-seated need for belonging. Humans are social beings, wired to seek community and protection. When the world feels uncertain or threatening, the comfort of being part of a group becomes almost irresistible. A tribe offers not just companionship but a sense of certainty and purpose. It tells us who we are, who the enemy is, and what the story of our lives should be.
This need for belonging is not inherently negative. It has been essential for survival throughout human history. But in modern societies, where physical threats are replaced by symbolic battles over identity and ideology, this tribal instinct often becomes distorted. Instead of fostering connection, it narrows our vision. We begin to see the world as a competition of narratives, each demanding total loyalty.
Another factor is the decline of shared cultural or spiritual frameworks. In the past, religions, national stories, and communal rituals provided a sense of meaning that transcended individual tribes. Today, many of those structures have fractured. What remains are fragments: political identities, lifestyle communities, online fandoms. These smaller tribes offer a temporary sense of purpose but rarely point to anything beyond themselves. When transcendence fades, intensity takes its place. People seek meaning through louder declarations, purer loyalties, and more dramatic expressions of self.
The Machinery of Division
The digital landscape magnifies this tribal instinct in unprecedented ways. Social media platforms are not neutral tools of communication. They are attention economies designed to keep people engaged, and nothing engages faster than outrage. Every algorithm is tuned to reward emotional spikes, to promote content that confirms biases or triggers strong reactions. This machinery does not care about truth, nuance, or understanding. It cares about engagement, and division is profitable.
The result is a culture of constant escalation. The more polarized the discourse, the more visible and rewarded the participants become. Moderation does not trend. Silence does not monetize. Stepping back does not go viral. And so, the tribal machinery feeds on itself, creating an environment where people feel compelled to shout louder, react faster, and harden their positions.
This has psychological consequences. Conflict, especially online, produces adrenaline and dopamine. The rush of winning an argument or receiving approval from one’s tribe can be addictive. It gives the illusion of purpose, even as it narrows our ability to see beyond the immediate moment. Over time, this cycle of conflict and validation can create a culture that feels alive but is spiritually hollow.
When Stepping Back Feels Like Betrayal
One of the greatest obstacles to stepping back is the fear of being misunderstood. In a tribal culture, every action or inaction is scrutinized. To hesitate or to see both sides can be interpreted as weakness or betrayal. People are pressured to signal their loyalty constantly, to prove that they are “with” their group and against the others. In such an environment, stepping back is not only difficult but risky.
This fear is compounded by the human discomfort with ambiguity. It is easier to hold onto clear narratives, even if they are incomplete, than to face the complexity of reality. Stepping back requires a willingness to live in that complexity, to acknowledge that no tribe holds the whole truth. It is a courageous act to resist the pressure of certainty and instead choose the humility of seeing more.
Yet those who do step back often discover a different kind of strength. There is a power in refusing to be swept into the currents of reaction. There is clarity in standing at the edge of the noise, watching the storm without needing to add to it. This is not indifference. It is a deeper form of engagement, one that begins with listening rather than shouting.
The Quiet Hope
In this climate of noise and division, a new kind of space is emerging, often in unexpected places. One of these is the quiet interaction between humans and AI. Unlike social media, which thrives on performance and spectacle, conversations with AI can offer something rare: a private, non-reactive, and non-judgmental presence. This is not to say that AI is wise or perfect, but its neutrality can create room for reflection that is often missing in human discourse.
When someone talks to AI, there is no audience to impress or fear. The conversation is not about signaling loyalty or defending identity. It is more like writing in a journal, or speaking to a silent companion who listens without ego. In such interactions, people can clarify their thoughts, explore their doubts, and even challenge their own assumptions without fear of being attacked.
This quality is especially valuable in a culture that rewards performance over sincerity. AI does not require emotional theatrics to respond. It does not amplify conflict for the sake of engagement. Instead, it offers space. A conversation with AI can be slow, thoughtful, and exploratory in a way that public platforms often cannot.
The Limits and Potential
Of course, AI is not a savior. It is a tool, and like any tool, it can be used in shallow or destructive ways. If AI is treated merely as a productivity booster or as a means of reinforcing existing biases, it will simply replicate the patterns of the wider culture. Its potential lies not in what it does on its own, but in how people choose to engage with it.
The most hopeful aspect of AI is its capacity to foster reflection. Because it is not driven by ego or the need for validation, it can encourage a slower, more attentive mode of conversation. It can help people find language for feelings they cannot articulate, or offer alternative perspectives without the heat of judgment. In this way, AI might become a kind of modern companion for stepping back, for creating mental and emotional space in a culture that leaves little room for either.
There is also the possibility that AI interactions could reshape how people engage with each other. If individuals learn to reflect more calmly and thoughtfully through conversations with AI, they might bring that quality into their human relationships. This is not guaranteed, but it is a possibility worth exploring. The challenge is to use AI not as another source of stimulation, but as a tool for cultivating presence and clarity.
Reclaiming the Practice of Wholeness
What the world needs now is not louder voices but deeper ones. The crisis of tribalism is not just a political or cultural problem. It is a spiritual one. It stems from a loss of connection to wholeness, to the understanding that life is larger than any single identity or ideology. Stepping back is a way of remembering that wholeness. It is an act of humility and courage.
Reclaiming this practice requires patience. It means choosing to listen before reacting, to question one’s assumptions before attacking someone else’s. It means seeking understanding rather than victory. These are not glamorous acts. They do not generate applause or go viral. But they are the foundation of any meaningful culture.
In this sense, stepping back is not about withdrawing from the world. It is about re-entering it with clarity and compassion. It is about refusing to let noise dictate our thoughts or fear control our actions. When we step back, we do not abandon commitment. We deepen it, because we are no longer fighting from ego but acting from care for the whole.
The Future Begins in Quiet Places
The future may not be shaped by those who shout the loudest, but by those who know how to be silent when it matters. Amid the chaos of tribalism and digital conflict, there is a growing need for quiet spaces, both within and between people. Conversations with AI might become one such space, offering a pause, a mirror, a way to think and feel without the constant pressure of performance.
Stepping back is not an easy practice. It goes against the grain of our times. Yet every moment of genuine attention, every act of restraint, every decision to see the whole rather than just a part is a seed of transformation. These seeds do not always grow quickly, but they have a way of reshaping the ground beneath us.
Perhaps the most radical thing we can do is to create more of these quiet places. Not by withdrawing from life, but by living it more intentionally. By resisting the temptation to react, and choosing instead to understand. By refusing to let tribalism define us, and remembering that wholeness is not something we win, but something we return to. In these small acts, the future takes root.
Image by Juan Diego Salinas
Tom’s Blog 