In the industrial age, labor was not just an economic activity. It was the very definition of human life. Marxism, born in the thick of factory smoke and the rise of machinery, saw work as the essential human act; the way we shape the world, relate to each other, and even become ourselves. Marx did not simply advocate for better wages or fairer conditions. He argued that labor is what makes us human, and that alienation happens when this labor is divorced from meaning, ownership, and purpose.
This worldview was deeply influenced by the rhythms of industrial society. The factory, not the home or the temple, became the core stage of modern life. The laborer, especially the industrial worker, was seen as both the victim and the hero of history. He was the one exploited by the capitalist system, but also the one with the potential to overturn it. Through his collective labor, history itself could be transformed.
What made this vision compelling was its deep moral grounding. Work was not portrayed as mere drudgery, but as the field of human self-realization. The promise of a post-capitalist world was not a world without work, but a world where work would be liberated. You could farm in the morning, teach in the afternoon, and write poetry at night. No longer alienated, you would be whole.
The Information Age and the Elasticity of Labor
But the world moved on. As the machines grew quieter and the factories moved offshore or vanished, the dominant form of labor shifted. The hands gave way to the head. Knowledge workers, service providers, consultants, analysts, and designers filled offices and Zoom rooms. The products of labor became harder to touch. Reports, presentations, interfaces, and code replaced coal and steel. Yet even as the substance of work changed, the assumption remained the same: to be valuable, you must be useful.
Marxism had to stretch. The original emphasis on material production gave way to a broader understanding of economic activity. Neo-Marxist thinkers began to interpret intellectual and service labor as forms of value creation, subject to the same logic of exploitation. A software engineer who writes code for a tech firm still sells her time, and the surplus value of her labor still flows upward. A call center agent might not make physical goods, but his emotional labor is monetized just the same.
The ideology of meritocracy flourished in this period. If you were smart enough, skilled enough, or adaptive enough, you could find your niche. You could become indispensable in a world that prized innovation and mental agility. The old class struggle may have been muted, but the pressure to be productive never went away. Even in the university or the hospital, even in nonprofits and ministries, the demand to prove your value echoed louder than ever.
AI and the Displacement of Human Relevance
And now, something stranger is arriving. Artificial intelligence is not just another technological tool. It is a force that challenges the very idea that human labor is essential. For centuries, our dignity has been tethered to our ability to contribute. What happens when contribution is no longer required?
AI does not tire. It does not unionize. It does not ask for meaning. It performs tasks that once took years of education or hours of emotional labor. It writes code. It generates reports. It composes music. It teaches. It diagnoses. And it learns to do these things better and faster with each iteration. What was once the protected domain of human intelligence is now becoming a shared domain, one where machines often outperform us.
This is more than economic disruption. It is existential. In the past, being unemployed meant being unlucky or unqualified. Today, it might simply mean being unnecessary. And that is a much harder burden to carry. Universal basic income may offer material security, but it cannot fill the hollow left when a person begins to suspect they are no longer needed by the world.
The narrative of human uniqueness, once grounded in labor and reason, is now trembling. We find ourselves asking not only how we will live, but why. If the world no longer depends on us, what anchors our sense of worth?
The Fragility of Conditional Dignity
This moment forces us to confront a truth we have long resisted. Our systems, capitalist, socialist, religious, educational, have often rewarded people for being useful. This includes not just the productive, but the clever, the charming, the strong, and the adaptable. We admire those who contribute and serve, and we often pity or ignore those who cannot.
But usefulness is a thin thread. It frays with age, with illness, with injury. It fades in the face of automation and crisis. And when it snaps, many feel their identity unravel. This is the quiet despair of many who retire and suddenly feel invisible. It is the ache of those who live with disability in a society that rarely sees them as valuable. It is the silence that surrounds the unemployed or the underemployed in a world that equates purpose with output.
The myth that we are valuable because we are helpful runs deep. It shapes how we see others and how we see ourselves. And yet, as it becomes harder to sustain, it reveals its cruelty. It cannot explain the worth of a child, or an elder with dementia, or a person lying paralyzed in a hospital bed. And if it cannot explain them, then it cannot explain us either.
Learning to Love Without a Reason
What if our worth was never meant to come from our function? What if the deepest truth about us is not that we are useful, but that we are loved?
This is the quiet revolution of grace. It does not ask what you can do. It does not measure your output. It does not wait for performance. It simply affirms that your existence is already enough. That you are seen, and wanted, and known, not because of what you offer, but because of who you are.
This truth has been spoken by spiritual traditions for centuries. In Christianity, God loves the sinner before the repentance, the child before the growth, the wanderer before the return. In Buddhism, the intrinsic nature of all beings is already luminous, already sufficient. These are not metaphors. They are declarations of identity that do not rely on utility.
But to live this truth in a world shaped by work is difficult. We are trained to prove our worth. Even when we speak of rest, it is often framed as recovery for more productive effort. Even when we love, we subtly seek to be needed. To release that impulse is to enter a kind of uncharted space, where love is not earned but given.
A Different Kind of Solidarity
If we are to live in a world no longer organized around labor, we must learn to see dignity differently. Not as something attached to usefulness, but as something revealed in presence. In the quiet act of sitting with someone. In the attention we give to those who cannot repay us. In the way we listen, not to fix, but to understand.
This is a new kind of solidarity. One that includes not only the worker and the builder, but also the one who can no longer work or build. One that sees in the disabled child, the silent elder, the mentally ill, a kind of worth that no algorithm can calculate.
Education must change. It must teach not only skills, but how to accompany. Spirituality must deepen. It must speak not only of doing good, but of receiving grace. Community must widen. It must make room for those who have been displaced not only by systems, but by the inner shame of no longer being needed.
This is not a return to old values. It is the birth of something we have not yet fully imagined.
Living in the Age of Unconditionality
We are now standing at the edge of a strange and tender frontier. The world may soon be one in which fewer and fewer people are required to sustain life as we know it. The question is not only how we will distribute resources, but how we will rediscover meaning.
Can we love ourselves and others without a story of contribution? Can we build a culture that sees worth not in talent or efficiency, but in being itself? Can we, perhaps, begin to love like God loves, freely, without calculation, without need for return?
The age of labor may be ending. But something deeper is waiting to begin. Not the age of leisure. Not the age of entertainment. But the age of recognition. Of simply seeing, and being seen. Of saying to one another, even in silence: You are here. You are loved. That is enough.
Image by Ofoto Ray
Tom’s Blog 