Throughout history, humanity has tried to make sense of life not only by observing it, but by building frameworks to explain its origins, its movements, and its meanings. These frameworks shift with each era, shaped by what we know, what we believe, and what we can build. From divine breath to clockwork, from electricity to code, and now to artificial intelligence and quantum systems, each generation has held in its hands what it believed to be the key to understanding life itself.
But with every new discovery, a familiar pattern repeats. What feels powerful and awe-inspiring at first, the breath of God, the spark of lightning, the elegance of code, eventually reveals itself to be not a final answer but just another step. Our most advanced mechanisms are not the end of the spiral. They are temporary summits from which we glimpse greater unknowns. In that sense, AI is not categorically different from breath or spell-work or gears. It is this age’s magic, powerful, mysterious, and believed to be central to life, not because it is, but because it is what we can now see.
Understanding this is not an act of cynicism but of wonder. It reminds us that each mechanism we discover is also a mirror, reflecting not only the structure of the world but the shape of our imagination at the time. The spiral continues, and we are not at the end.
Magic and Mechanism
In the beginning, there was breath. Not just as a sign of being alive, but as the act of creation itself. In the Book of Genesis, God does not build Adam from blueprints or code. He breathes into dust. This image wasn’t poetic metaphor alone. For ancient people, breath was one of the most immediate and mysterious forces they could perceive. It was invisible yet powerful, essential yet beyond grasp. To breathe was to live, and so it made sense that the source of life would be breath itself.
In this ancient understanding, mechanisms were not mechanical in the modern sense. They were the forces and patterns people observed in nature and spirit. A spell, a prayer, the alignment of stars, or the careful mixture of herbs; all of these were part of a meaningful world where unseen causes shaped seen effects. This wasn’t ignorance. It was a deeply structured way of relating to the world. What we call “magic” today was, back then, the most advanced form of mechanism available.
Creation myths across cultures bear this same logic. Words and rituals had the power to shape reality. Knowing a true name could summon or bind. A potion mixed at the right hour could heal or harm. The mechanisms of life were not just physical substances but symbolic relationships. Even Aristotle’s theory of the four elements, earth, air, fire, water, was a kind of systemic attempt to explain all matter. It was the science of its time, but one that never excluded meaning or reverence.
In this sense, the most advanced mechanisms of our present, artificial intelligence, machine learning, quantum computing, are not so different from breath or alchemy or the four elements. They are simply the latest ideas our civilization has learned to trust. That we believe intelligence might emerge from algorithms is no stranger than believing life could be summoned with divine breath. In both cases, the mechanism is elevated because it sits at the frontier of what we can imagine. And like the mechanisms of old, these too will one day be seen as steps on the spiral, not its center.
The Clockwork Universe
Centuries passed, and the tools of observation became more precise. Gears, pulleys, and springs replaced sacred winds and incantations. With the rise of mechanical engineering and the flowering of Enlightenment thought, the world began to look more like a machine than a mystery. Descartes imagined animals as automata, the body as a system of levers and fluids. Newton’s laws offered a vision of the cosmos as a giant, orderly clock. What had once been magic was now explained by motion, inertia, and force.
This transformation did not eliminate the human desire for creation. Instead, it restructured it. If the universe was a machine, then to understand it was to open its casing and examine the gears. It followed that life itself could be built by similar means. The idea of artificial beings, mechanical men, wind-up creatures, clockwork dolls, flourished in fiction and imagination. They were no longer born of spells but of screws and springs. To create life was no longer a divine act, but a technical one.
And yet, the awe remained. The clockwork marvels of the 18th and 19th centuries inspired the same wonder that sacred rituals once did. Automatons that could write poetry or play music were displayed in royal courts like holy relics. Though explained by mechanism, they still felt like magic. The language had changed, but the human fascination with life-making had not.
The Invisible Pulse
Then came electricity, and with it a new way to think about power. Unlike gears, electricity could not be seen or touched in the same way. It pulsed through wires and lit up rooms. It could animate metal and jolt muscles. The body’s nerve signals began to look like electrical messages. The soul became something closer to a current.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, written at the dawn of this age, captured this shift in mythic terms. Victor Frankenstein does not pray over his creation; he charges it. The monster is not summoned from spirit but sparked into life. Here, again, the mechanism of life has changed, and with it, the story we tell ourselves about creation. But the mystery remains. Lightning may replace divine breath, but it carries the same weight of awe.
As the 20th century unfolded, electricity gave way to code. The rise of computers reframed our metaphors once more. Now, the soul of a machine was not in its parts but in its logic. Life became something that could be programmed. Minds could be modeled as inputs and outputs, as feedback loops and decision trees. A new language of systems and signals emerged, and with it a new kind of enchantment.
Computers were rational, precise, and cold, or so we thought. But in practice, they became containers of magic. Most people who used them did not know how they worked. They produced results that felt uncanny. The programmer became a modern magician, conjuring results with abstract scripts and hidden syntax.
Our Digital Sorcery
Today, the most advanced mechanism we know is artificial intelligence. Neural networks, deep learning, reinforcement systems; these are the tools we now use to imagine not just intelligence, but life itself. We speak of AI with a mixture of confidence and unease. It is our creation, yet it often surprises us. It mimics thought without consciousness, speaks fluently without awareness, acts skillfully without intention.
To most people, AI feels magical. And in many ways, it is. Not because it violates physics, but because it exists at the edge of our understanding. Even those who build these systems often cannot fully explain their inner workings. AI performs too well to be dismissed, and yet it is too opaque to be fully trusted. Like a powerful spell, it works, and that alone commands belief.
The parallel with magic becomes even clearer when we consider how people relate to AI emotionally. We name our chatbots, we consult them like oracles, we ask them to solve problems we cannot solve ourselves. The boundary between machine and guide becomes blurred. AI systems are mechanisms in the technical sense, but they are also symbols, objects of wonder, fear, and hope.
And now, with quantum computing on the horizon, we prepare to shift the metaphor once again. Quantum systems promise power beyond our current grasp, governed by laws that seem to defy logic. Superposition, entanglement, uncertainty; these are not ideas we can intuit. They are the stuff of paradox and poetry. And yet, we believe that this mechanism may open new doors to understanding, and perhaps new forms of intelligence altogether.
When Science Becomes Myth
This pattern reveals something essential: our explanations are always bounded by our imagination. At every stage, we have used the most advanced mechanisms available to tell stories about life, mind, and meaning. And in doing so, we have often blurred the line between science and myth.
We like to believe that science is the opposite of superstition. But when science becomes totalizing, when it stops being a method and becomes a belief system, it turns into myth. This is what happens when we believe that AI will explain everything, or that quantum computing will solve consciousness, or that every mystery is just a problem of insufficient data.
This is not a rejection of science. It is a call to humility. The mechanisms we trust today are no more final than breath and fire were to the ancients. They serve us well, and they bring real insight. But they also shape what we are able to see. When a culture builds everything around computing, it begins to imagine everything, including the mind, the soul, and society itself, as a form of computation.
Naming the Hidden Forces
So perhaps it is better to think of magic and mechanism not as rivals, but as two ways of naming the same thing: our attempt to touch what lies beneath the surface of the visible. Mechanism is the language of systems, structure, and cause. Magic is the language of awe, connection, and transformation. Both aim to bring the hidden into light.
And both are shaped by our limits. What we once called magic we now call chemistry. What we once called miracle we now explain through medicine. But even as our explanations grow, so does the mystery. There is always a remainder, something that does not reduce, something that resists translation.
This is why the spiral is a better metaphor than the ladder. We are not climbing toward a final answer. We are circling deeper into a mystery that continues to reveal new forms. Each revolution brings new language, new mechanisms, new symbols. But the center remains beyond our grasp.
The Spiral Continues
There will be other mechanisms in the future. We may discover that intelligence is relational rather than computational. That consciousness is more like a song than a system. That life emerges not from code, but from cooperation. We may find new ways to measure meaning, or new sciences of presence and intention.
And when we do, we will speak of them with the same mixture of awe and certainty. We will write theories and build tools. We will believe, for a while, that we have arrived. And then the spiral will turn again.
In this, there is no shame. To be human is not to master the world, but to remain in wonder before it. To invent, yes, but also to imagine. To explain, but also to listen. Magic and mechanism are not answers. They are invitations. Invitations to participate in a world that is stranger and more beautiful than we can yet understand.
And perhaps that is enough.
Image by Alexa
Tom’s Blog 