Justice, fairness, and equality are among the most celebrated ideals of modern society. We are told that every human being deserves equal rights, equal treatment, and a fair chance to succeed regardless of background, race, gender, or class. In a world shaped by liberal democracies and meritocratic values, this vision feels both necessary and righteous.
At first glance, this kind of society appears to be the fulfillment of moral progress. A world where justice prevails and people rise or fall purely based on effort and talent seems not only ideal but long overdue. Many of history’s deepest wounds have come from the absence of such fairness.
But there is a strange discomfort lurking beneath this perfection. As many have pointed out, a world of flawless justice may not be paradise, but something closer to a quiet kind of hell. Not because fairness is wrong, but because of what it demands from us, and what it removes as a comfort. When justice is absolute and opportunities are equal, there is only one person left to blame when things go wrong: ourselves.
When Fate Was Enough
Before the age of individual rights and personal choice, people lived within the contours of their inherited roles. A farmer’s child would be a farmer. A noble’s child would grow up in privilege. These roles were fixed, unquestioned, and often seen as ordained, by the gods, by fate, or by the natural order of things.
In such a world, injustice was everywhere, but it was not always experienced as injustice. People had limited expectations. The concept of rising through one’s own merit was not widely entertained, and neither was the possibility of failing on one’s own terms. If life was difficult, the explanation lay outside the self, in destiny, in the stars, in divine will. Suffering could be tragic, but it didn’t necessarily demand a personal explanation.
This lack of freedom came with its own kind of ease. When fate is in charge, the burden of self-evaluation is lighter. There are fewer “what ifs,” fewer doubts about decisions that could have been made differently. The world was full of cruelty, but at least it wasn’t always your fault.
The Invention of Freedom
The modern era introduced a different logic. Enlightenment thinkers laid the foundation for the principles of liberty, equality, and individual rights. Over centuries, these ideals reshaped the structure of societies around the globe. The old justifications for hierarchy, bloodline, divine right, inherited status, were questioned, and in many places, dismantled.
With this shift came a belief in merit. You could rise if you tried hard enough. You could reinvent yourself. You were no longer bound by birth or caste. This was a profound and necessary evolution, especially for those who had long been excluded from opportunity.
But freedom and fairness come with consequences. When the playing field is level, when society has worked to remove barriers, the spotlight shifts inward. No longer able to blame fate, people must now answer for their own position in life. If you fail, it’s because you didn’t work hard enough. If you’re unhappy, maybe you didn’t choose well. The same system that grants you freedom also strips away your excuses.
Perfect Fairness, Perfect Accountability
Imagine a society so perfectly fair that every individual starts with the same resources, support, and rights. In such a world, the notion of failure takes on a new sharpness. There’s no structural injustice to blame. No social ladder to resent. Just your own choices, your own limits, your own reflection.
This is the strange cruelty of a hyper-meritocratic world. It seems to celebrate human potential, but it also creates an unbearable pressure to justify one’s place. Every achievement becomes a mark of personal virtue. Every shortcoming becomes a kind of shame.
In earlier times, people feared injustice from rulers or the indifference of fate. Now, many fear their own inadequacy. The more society improves in terms of opportunity and fairness, the more psychologically brutal it can feel to those who still struggle. Justice, stripped of grace, becomes a judgment.
Too Much Freedom to Choose
Alongside this justice comes the second burden: too much freedom. Modern life presents not just fairness but a flood of options. What to study, where to live, which job to pursue, whom to marry, what to believe. Every day is filled with choices. And with each one comes a thousand that you did not make.
On the surface, this abundance is a gift. But it also feeds a quiet despair. Even when you are happy, you might wonder if another path would have made you happier. Even when you succeed, you think of the alternate lives you left behind. This is the paradox of choice: too many doors, too little peace.
And it goes deeper. In a world that tells you happiness is your responsibility, satisfaction becomes a moral duty. If you are unfulfilled, maybe you picked the wrong career. If you are lonely, maybe you are failing to be lovable. When every outcome is framed as a consequence of freedom, discontent feels like failure.
The Rise of Self-Help as a Survival Mechanism
It’s no surprise that the modern world is saturated with self-help books, life hacks, productivity gurus, and endless advice about how to “optimize” your life. In a system where you can’t blame the world, the burden to improve lies squarely with the individual.
Self-help is, in many ways, the secular religion of a meritocratic age. It promises salvation through better habits, morning routines, mindset shifts, and diet plans. It teaches that success is possible for anyone, if only they work hard enough on themselves. But behind this hopeful message lies a harsh implication: if you are not thriving, then you must be doing something wrong.
The result is a cycle of self-criticism disguised as self-improvement. We become obsessed with upgrading ourselves, not out of joy, but out of fear. A fear of falling behind. A fear of being average. A fear of being to blame.
We love ourselves too much and we hate ourselves too much. We monitor, judge, and correct ourselves endlessly. The mirror never leaves our side.
Meritocracy Without Mercy
Meritocracy was supposed to be fairer than aristocracy. And in many ways, it is. But when fairness is implemented without compassion, it becomes punishing. The logic is simple: those who win deserve to win. And those who lose? They must deserve that too.
This kind of thinking creeps into education, hiring, healthcare, and even our social circles. We start to assume that the successful are inherently better, not just more fortunate. We become suspicious of weakness, of struggle, of failure. The safety nets that once caught the unlucky now look like indulgences. The system hardens.
And yet, nobody is fully in control. No amount of freedom or fairness can eliminate randomness, illness, trauma, or simple bad timing. Life is still life. But in a society drunk on merit, these facts are inconvenient. We’re expected to overcome everything. We are allowed no excuses, even when excuses would be human.
Rediscovering the Space for Grace
So how do we live in a world that has grown so just and yet so cold? The answer is not to undo freedom or give up on equality. These are among humanity’s greatest achievements. But we must pair them with something older and perhaps forgotten: mercy.
We need space for imperfection, not just in systems, but in ourselves. We must remember that not every flaw is a failure, and not every failure is a fault. Success should inspire, but not humiliate. Fairness must be tempered by forgiveness. Choice must be held gently, without becoming a weapon of self-judgment.
Perhaps we also need to reclaim a sense of mystery. The premodern world may have lacked fairness, but it had room for fate, for silence, for things beyond human control. In modern life, where everything is your responsibility, that humility is missing.
We must make room again for luck, for grace, for the unknown. Not to deny agency, but to remind ourselves that not everything depends on personal performance. That sometimes, it’s okay to simply be.
A Justice That Heals
A perfectly just world, without empathy, can be suffocating. A perfectly free world, without wisdom, can be paralyzing. The challenge of modern life is not to abandon our ideals but to hold them alongside the truth of human limitation.
We are not machines. We are not formulas. We are not gods of our own making. We are fallible, vulnerable, dependent, and imperfect creatures. And that is not something to be corrected, but something to be embraced.
Real justice is not about perfect accountability. It is about recognizing when accountability must be balanced with care. Real freedom is not about endless choice. It is about the ability to live meaningfully within limits.
If there is a way out of this quiet modern hell, it begins with kindness to others, yes, but especially to ourselves. Only then can justice feel less like a judgment and more like a form of healing.
Image by Ezequiel Octaviano
Tom’s Blog 