Throughout history, humanity has sought to understand the fabric of reality. We have looked to the stars, the atom, and the abstract language of mathematics to explain the world around us.
Today, advances in computing, digital physics, and philosophical inquiry have converged to suggest that everything, including the universe itself, might be fundamentally composed of information.
Yet, this perspective does not simply reduce reality to static code; it also invites us to consider how the future, with its open horizon of possibilities, can shape the present and even reframe the past. This dynamic relationship, often called meta-causality, challenges the linear view of time that has dominated scientific thought for centuries.
Information as the Fabric of Reality
The idea that information might underlie everything in the universe has grown steadily in recent decades. From the elegant equations of physics to the algorithms that drive our computers, there is a growing sense that the universe itself operates like a vast computational system. This perspective, sometimes referred to as digital physics, suggests that the complexities of galaxies, particles, and even consciousness emerge from underlying informational processes.
Max Tegmark’s Mathematical Universe Hypothesis takes this notion to an even more radical level. He proposes that the universe is not just described by mathematics but is mathematics itself. Every equation, every geometric structure, and every logical relationship might exist independently of any observer, forming the bedrock of what we call reality. This idea resonates with the way we build simulations and models. When scientists simulate planetary systems, climate dynamics, or even entire universes, they encode the behavior of these systems into digital frameworks. These simulations rely on information, stored in bits and processed through algorithms, to capture the essence of physical processes.
Yet, despite its elegance, the concept that information is the substance of reality raises profound questions. If the universe is information, does that mean it is akin to a computer program, complete with rules, states, and transitions? Could our own consciousness emerge from informational interactions rather than a mysterious spark of life? These questions push us to reconsider not just the nature of the cosmos but the nature of our own existence within it.
The Limits of Predictability
While the notion of the universe as information-rich is compelling, it does not necessarily imply that everything is predictable. Complexity and chaos remind us that even simple rules can give rise to outcomes that defy easy forecasting. The famous butterfly effect illustrates how minute differences in initial conditions can lead to vastly different results, making long-term predictions effectively impossible.
Quantum mechanics introduces another layer of unpredictability. At the fundamental level of particles, outcomes are governed not by deterministic rules but by probabilities. An electron’s position or momentum cannot be precisely known until it is measured, and even then, it reflects a statistical likelihood rather than a fixed certainty. This probabilistic nature of the universe means that information unfolds dynamically, and certainty is often replaced by a spectrum of possibilities.
Emergence further complicates the picture. Even in systems governed by deterministic laws, new properties can arise that are not easily reducible to their components. The collective behavior of neurons gives rise to consciousness, yet no single neuron contains the essence of thought. This emergence is a testament to the richness of information as it expresses itself across scales, revealing patterns and phenomena that surprise even the most meticulous observer.
The Future Shaping the Present
Beyond the question of whether the universe is information lies a more intriguing idea: that the future can influence the present and even reinterpret the past. Traditionally, causality runs forward. The past shapes the present, and the present unfolds into the future. However, our lived experience often challenges this straightforward progression.
In daily life, intentions and goals play a crucial role in shaping our actions. A student studying medicine might feel the weight of long hours and difficult exams, but these struggles gain meaning when seen in the light of future aspirations. The dream of becoming a doctor transforms the present hardships into necessary steps along a meaningful path. This dynamic, where the future shapes the present, is a form of meta-causality that is deeply embedded in human experience.
The influence of the future on the past is also evident in the way we reinterpret events once we know their outcomes. A past failure may seem like a mistake until it becomes clear that it was a stepping stone to success. The disappointment of a lost job might later be reframed as the catalyst for finding a more fulfilling career. In this way, the unfolding of future events retroactively shapes the narrative of the past, imbuing it with a coherence that was not apparent at the time.
Phenomenology and Human Consciousness
The philosophical tradition of phenomenology, pioneered by Edmund Husserl, offers profound insights into how time and intention shape experience. Husserl described consciousness as always being in a state of anticipation. Even in the simple act of listening to music, the mind holds onto the note that just played, experiences the note currently sounding, and anticipates the note about to come. This structure, retention, impression, and protention, demonstrates that the mind is never static but constantly engaged with the flow of time.
Martin Heidegger expanded on this by emphasizing that human existence is fundamentally oriented toward the future. He described this orientation as being-towards-death, not in a morbid sense, but as an acknowledgment that the horizon of our lives shapes our choices and projects. The future is not just an outcome of the present but a guiding force that gives meaning to our actions.
Jean-Paul Sartre added another layer by arguing that human beings define themselves through their projects. Our actions in the present are guided by the future goals we set, and in turn, these goals shape how we interpret our past. A failed relationship may take on a new meaning when seen in light of a subsequent, more fulfilling one. This interplay of time in consciousness reveals that causality is not a one-way street but a complex dialogue between past, present, and future.
Physics and the Challenge of Linear Time
While phenomenology and existentialism highlight the subjective experience of meta-causality, physics introduces intriguing possibilities for objective, time-defying relationships. In the block universe model of relativity, time is treated as a dimension similar to space. All events, past, present, and future, exist together in a four-dimensional spacetime. This view challenges the idea of a moving present and suggests that the future, in some sense, is as real as the past.
Quantum mechanics adds further nuance with phenomena like the delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment. In this scenario, a choice made in the present can influence the outcome of a measurement that, in classical terms, should already be determined. Although this does not imply that we can change the past in any straightforward way, it does suggest that the boundaries between past and future are more fluid than our everyday experience might suggest.
These scientific perspectives, while still under debate, invite us to consider that causality might not be strictly linear. Instead, the universe might contain feedback loops and connections that defy a simple past-to-future sequence. This possibility resonates with the human experience of meta-causality, where the future horizon shapes the present and recasts the past in new light.
Bridging Information and Meta-Causality
If the universe is fundamentally composed of information, and if causality is more flexible than we once thought, then perhaps information itself is not static but dynamic, constantly unfolding through time. In this view, the universe is not a prewritten script but a living process of information expressing itself through possibilities. Each moment is both an outcome of past states and a doorway to future possibilities that, in turn, shape the unfolding of the present.
This dynamic perspective aligns with our lived experience of intentionality. The future is not merely something that will happen; it is something that shapes what is happening now. Our goals, dreams, and fears draw us toward certain possibilities and away from others. In the same way, the universe, as an informational structure, might be inherently future-oriented, with possibilities guiding the present toward certain configurations.
Moreover, this view honors the unpredictability inherent in complex systems and quantum events. The future is not fully determined but exists as a range of potentialities. As these potentialities unfold, they reveal information that was always implicit but not yet actualized. This process mirrors the human journey, where each choice, each action, reveals a part of who we are and who we might become.
The Unfolding of Possibility
The exploration of information and meta-causality challenges us to rethink the nature of reality. Information, once thought of as mere description, emerges as a possible foundation of the universe itself. Yet this informational universe is not a cold, deterministic machine. Instead, it is alive with possibilities, unpredictability, and the influence of the future on the present. This dynamic interplay between information and meta-causality reflects both the structure of the cosmos and the richness of human experience.
By recognizing that the future can shape the present and that the past is often rewritten in the light of what is yet to come, we gain a deeper appreciation for the complexity of existence. We are not passive observers in a fixed universe but active participants in an unfolding process of information and meaning. In this view, the universe is not just a collection of facts but a living dialogue between possibility and actuality, where the future’s promise continually reshapes the present and reinterprets the past.
In embracing this perspective, we find that the universe is not merely a place to be explained but a reality to be lived; a journey of discovery where information is not just data but the very medium through which we create, explore, and understand the unfolding story of existence.
Image by MED BENCHIKH
Tom’s Blog 