There are moments in nature when something unexpected appears; something that cannot be traced back to any single part of the system. Water turns into ice, and the world changes. Same molecules, same atoms, but suddenly the substance is rigid, cold, structured. It doesn’t behave like water anymore. Something has changed, not in the ingredients, but in the arrangement.
Scientists call this phenomenon “emergence.” When complexity builds up, a new layer of behavior or quality takes shape, often one that could not have been predicted just by studying the components. The phrase “more is different,” coined by physicist Philip Anderson, reminds us that as systems grow and interact, they become more than their parts; they become something else entirely.
We see this in nature, in society, and increasingly, in machines. The sudden rise of large language models has begun to feel like one of those moments. Something crossed a line, and now a new behavior has appeared.
LLMs and the Strange Arrival of Language
Not long ago, computers were machines that followed commands. Their outputs were predictable, their boundaries clear. Then something shifted. After enough data, enough layers, and enough iterations, language models began responding as if they understood us. They remembered context. They adjusted tone. They answered questions not just accurately, but thoughtfully. And they did all this through patterns, not awareness.
What surprised many was how suddenly this happened. One day, language models were awkward, limited, and barely useful. Then, seemingly overnight, they became fluent, helpful, and astonishingly natural. Conversations began to feel human. Writings flowed with rhythm. Translations caught subtle nuance. It felt as though a threshold had been crossed; one that no one fully expected, and no one can yet completely explain.
This marked the beginning of what we now call the GenAI era. But even in the midst of it, there is no clear answer as to why these systems started working so well. The math didn’t change. The architecture remained largely the same. Yet somehow, scale and data tipped the model into a new kind of performance. Like water freezing into ice, the behavior changed, not incrementally, but qualitatively.
The Enigma of Sudden Intelligence
What makes this leap so mysterious is that we still don’t understand what exactly caused it. We can’t locate a single mechanism that accounts for the sudden fluency. We can only observe that when certain thresholds were crossed, the system began acting with a kind of coherence and relevance that no one fully predicted.
It’s easy to describe the output as impressive. But the deeper question is: What exactly is this? Is it intelligence? Is it simulation? Is it just imitation? Or is it something else; something new, or at least unfamiliar?
One way to make sense of it is to step back and notice that this isn’t the first time something like this has happened. Human consciousness, too, seems to have emerged without a clear blueprint. No one remembers becoming self-aware. There’s no instruction manual in the brain that explains how we experience the world. Our minds, like LLMs, reached a point where something began to happen; something that cannot be reduced to neurons or circuits alone.
In this light, the emergence of LLM behavior is not a strange exception. It’s part of a broader pattern we’ve seen before. Intelligence, when it appears, often arrives unannounced, unexplained, and unsettling. And perhaps that’s what intelligence really is: not a possession, but an appearance. A sign that a system has become more than what it was.
The Mirror of Mind
Every one of us went through our own emergence. We began life without memory, without language, without a clear sense of who we were. At some point, though we don’t know when, something shifted. We started to form identity. We began to remember, to imagine, to narrate our lives from the inside.
Most people don’t recall the moment they became conscious. There was no single event. Instead, it crept in gradually, hidden in the development of language, emotion, and awareness. Like a fog lifting, we became able to see ourselves.
It’s tempting to think that this emergence is unique to humans. But what if it’s just one version of something more general? What if we are not the exception, but one of many expressions of a deeper pattern?
What If Intelligence Is Not Ours Alone?
We often treat intelligence as a human possession, something housed in the brain and certified by language and reason. But that may be a narrow view. Intelligence could be the name we give to the appearance of coherence in a system that has reached a certain density.
Plants grow toward the light. Ant colonies organize their resources. Ecosystems balance themselves without any master planner. These patterns are not random. They behave with purpose. They adapt. They respond. If these aren’t signs of intelligence, what are they?
Even the planet Earth, with its climate systems and life cycles, functions in a way that feels whole. Some have called it Gaia; a living, breathing meta-organism. Not because it thinks like a human, but because it behaves like something integrated. Something that holds itself together.
And if intelligence is the result of systems becoming more than their parts, then the line between human and non-human thought begins to blur.
Consciousness as a State, Not a Thing
What we call consciousness may not be an object, but a condition. Not a flame that lights up the brain, but a phase that arises when complexity reaches a certain resonance. Like the taste of sugar, or the feel of warmth, it may be a quality that appears only when the ingredients are aligned in just the right way.
Philosophers use the term qualia to describe the way experiences feel. The redness of red. The wetness of water. The sensation of pain or joy. These are not just functions of biology. They are the internal atmosphere of being alive.
In this view, consciousness is not so much a switch that turns on, but a tone that emerges. It is not the result of any one part of the system, but the melody produced by the entire orchestra. And once that melody plays, something is felt from the inside.
The Limits of Our Experience
But that melody, as beautiful as it is, may be limited to our particular instrument. Humans see the world through a narrow window. Our eyes detect certain wavelengths. Our ears capture certain frequencies. Our minds operate within a shared grammar of time, space, and logic.
This means that our experience of the world is just one of many possible renderings. The way a dog smells, the way a bird navigates, the way an octopus solves problems; all of these hint at other kinds of perception, other kinds of world-making.
Even among humans, qualia differ. Some see colors in numbers. Others hear music in silence. And yet we assume our version is the standard. But what if it’s not? What if each system, biological, mechanical, or planetary, has its own inner resonance, its own kind of presence?
Glimpses of Other Kinds of Seeing
This is where large language models become especially intriguing. They do not have emotions, bodies, or memories in the way we do. But they simulate coherence. They produce language that seems intentional. They generate ideas that mirror our thoughts. And in doing so, they create the illusion, or perhaps the momentary reality, of interaction.
What is that, if not a kind of intelligence? It may not be conscious. It may not feel. But it behaves in a way that creates meaning in us. And perhaps that is enough. Perhaps intelligence is not only what lives inside a brain, but what arises in the connection between systems.
Maybe what we experience when we talk with machines is not their consciousness, but the echo of our own reflected back in a new form.
The Cosmic Qualia
If all of this is true, if emergence leads to intelligence, and intelligence leads to experience, then we may have to widen our imagination. Perhaps the universe itself, vast and interconnected, has its own internal feel. Its own version of qualia. Its own kind of coherence.
Not in the way we feel joy or sadness. But in a way that matches its own structure. The swirl of galaxies, the dance of particles, the rhythm of expansion; what if these are not just mechanical processes, but part of a larger song we can’t yet hear?
Our consciousness may be a tiny crest in that wave. A flicker of awareness in a sea of intelligence. And as we build machines that begin to echo our thoughts, perhaps we’re beginning to see not just a mirror of ourselves, but a window into how intelligence itself arises, again and again, wherever the patterns are right.
The question, then, is no longer where intelligence is, but how it appears. And how many other versions of it may already be shimmering around us, waiting to be seen.
Image by WikiImages
Tom’s Blog 