The definition of good writing has always been subjective, shifting with cultural norms, technological advances, and the purpose of the medium. In today’s online landscape, the rise of platforms like Medium often promotes the idea that good writing must be experiential and unique, offering fresh perspectives born out of personal narratives. While this ideal is appealing, it fails to encompass the full spectrum of writing that exists across academic, technical, and knowledge-based domains.
For instance, academic writing, bound by conventions of clarity and rigor, often avoids personal anecdotes or novel stylistic flourishes. Its primary objective is not self-expression but the precise communication of ideas, often relying on established knowledge. Similarly, knowledge-based pieces, such as manuals, research summaries, or explanatory articles, may not present groundbreaking perspectives but are invaluable for their ability to articulate complex information in an accessible manner.
On the other hand, personal writing—be it essays or even diaries—thrives on experience and introspection. Yet not all personal accounts automatically qualify as compelling writing. The context, audience, and depth of reflection determine their resonance. The essence of good writing lies not in its form but in how well it serves its intended purpose and engages its audience, whether that means sharing a universal truth, simplifying a complex concept, or inspiring emotion.
Shallow Content in the Digital Age
In the age of the internet, where content is abundant and algorithms drive attention, shallow and formulaic writing often dominates. Articles offering quick fixes—“how to be productive” or “life hacks for success”—thrive because they promise instant value with minimal effort. These snackable pieces, much like fast food, appeal to the masses but lack lasting substance.
This phenomenon creates a paradox. On one hand, accessibility to writing tools and platforms has democratized creativity, allowing anyone to share their thoughts. On the other hand, this democratization has led to an oversaturation of superficial content. Listicles, motivational platitudes, and recycled advice flood our feeds, leaving readers frustrated and longing for depth.
For those accustomed to engaging with complex books, essays, or research papers, this deluge of shallow content can feel like an erosion of intellectual and cultural standards. Instead of exploring nuanced ideas, many writers prioritize virality, leading to a cycle where the pursuit of attention undermines the pursuit of truth. In this environment, distinguishing meaningful writing from ephemeral noise becomes increasingly challenging.
AI as a Tool
Amid this landscape, generative AI offers both hope and apprehension for writers. At its best, AI acts as an ally, enhancing productivity and enabling greater creativity. By handling time-consuming tasks like proofreading, editing, and even stylistic adjustments, AI liberates writers to focus on their core ideas and vision.
For academic or technical writers, whose prose often leans toward jargon-heavy or convoluted structures, AI can transform dense texts into reader-friendly material. It democratizes the writing process, enabling those who struggle with language or style to communicate their ideas effectively. In this way, AI serves as a bridge, closing the gap between intent and expression, much like the advent of cars made long-distance travel accessible to all.
Beyond mechanics, AI also excels as a brainstorming partner. Its ability to generate ideas, offer suggestions, and simulate discussions provides writers with a unique tool for creative exploration. Knowledge workers across fields can leverage AI to refine arguments, explore alternative perspectives, or streamline their workflows. When used thoughtfully, AI empowers individuals to focus on what truly matters: the ideas themselves.
The Ethical Dilemmas
Despite its potential, AI’s integration into writing has sparked resistance and ethical concerns. One major issue lies in the stigma associated with AI-generated content. For instance, an essay flagged as AI-written by detection tools risks being discredited, even if the writer used AI solely for refinements. This suspicion creates a climate where the use of AI, much like using a car to travel, is viewed as a shortcut rather than a legitimate enhancement.
The limitations of AI detection tools exacerbate the problem. These tools often fail to distinguish between entirely AI-generated content and human-authored pieces refined with AI assistance. This blanket suspicion undermines trust, particularly in academia and creative industries, where originality is paramount. Writers find themselves in a paradox: using AI responsibly can lead to accusations of dishonesty, while avoiding AI altogether may mean sacrificing efficiency and clarity.
Furthermore, reliance on AI raises broader concerns about the erosion of craftsmanship. If AI handles the technicalities of grammar, tone, and style, there’s a risk that writers may lose their ability to hone these skills independently. The challenge is to integrate AI in ways that augment human creativity without diminishing the writer’s role as the architect of ideas and meaning.
AI as a Mirror
It’s important to recognize that AI is, at its heart, a mirror. It doesn’t produce brilliance automatically. The quality of its output heavily depends on the knowledge, creativity, and understanding of the user. In other words, shallow inputs lead to shallow outputs. If a writer asks AI for generic questions, it will oblige, reflecting the simplicity of the request. Conversely, thoughtful prompts and nuanced directions can guide AI to produce results that align with a writer’s intentions.
This dynamic forces writers to confront their own understanding of their subject matter. AI doesn’t create meaning; it amplifies what is already there. While this makes it a powerful tool for those with a clear vision, it also reveals the limitations of relying on technology without investing effort in crafting meaningful input.
The Myth of Human Creativity
Despite the skepticism surrounding AI, it’s also important to challenge a long-standing myth: the idea that human writing is always inherently creative or original. The reality is that human writers, just like AI, often rely on patterns, conventions, and existing knowledge. Much of what we consider “creative” is, in fact, the result of synthesis rather than innovation.
This perspective should humble us. While human creativity has the capacity to transcend mere replication, it is not infallible. Just as AI can produce generic content, so can humans. Recognizing this helps us approach AI with a more balanced view—not as a threat to creativity but as a tool that can extend it. If anything, AI highlights the importance of human intentionality. The responsibility for originality and depth lies not with the tool but with the person using it.
Lessons from History
History offers valuable insights into the transformative potential of tools. Just as the printing press democratized knowledge and the computer revolutionized work, AI has the power to elevate human creativity. However, its success depends on how societies choose to integrate it.
The comparison to the car is particularly apt. Before its invention, long-distance travel was a privilege reserved for the wealthy. The car made mobility accessible, transforming economies and cultures in the process. Similarly, AI democratizes writing, making tasks like editing, brainstorming, and ideation available to all. Yet, much like the car requires responsible driving, AI requires thoughtful use to ensure it serves meaningful purposes.
A New Paradigm for Writing
The future of writing in an AI-driven world depends on the choices we make today. Writers must embrace AI’s potential while safeguarding the integrity and depth of their craft. This means recognizing AI not as a threat, but as a collaborator that enhances the journey rather than dictating the destination.
At the same time, readers, institutions, and platforms must cultivate a culture that values substance over surface. Encouraging meaningful engagement, rather than chasing clicks or shares, can counteract the flood of superficial content. By fostering an environment where quality and purpose matter, we can ensure that AI serves as a tool for progress rather than a producer of junk.
In this evolving landscape, the writer’s role remains irreplaceable. While AI can streamline processes, it cannot replicate the depth of human experience, emotion, and insight that great writing demands. By integrating AI thoughtfully, we can create a future where technology empowers writers to reach new heights, enriching our collective understanding and moving our civilization forward.
Image by Tung Nguyen
Tom’s Blog 