Søren Kierkegaard, a Danish philosopher and theologian, is often considered a pivotal figure in existential thought. His work “Fear and Trembling,” written under the pseudonym Johannes de silentio, delves deep into the complexities of faith, using the Biblical story of Abraham’s commanded sacrifice of his son, Isaac, as its central motif. In this narrative, Kierkegaard explores the daunting and paradoxical nature of faith, challenging readers to consider what it truly means to believe and to what extent one might go in obedience to divine command.
“Fear and Trembling” poses profound questions about the nature of faith, demanding a suspension of the ethical and rational in favor of what Kierkegaard deems the “teleological suspension of the ethical.” Through the character of Abraham, the epitome of the “knight of faith,” Kierkegaard examines the tension between the universal ethical duties to others and the individual’s personal relationship with God. This sets the stage to discuss how true faith, according to Kierkegaard, is not merely about religious fervor or adherence to dogma but involves a deeply personal, existential challenge that encompasses fear, trembling, and a paradoxical leap into the absurd.
The Knight of Faith
In “Fear and Trembling,” Kierkegaard introduces the concept of the “knight of faith,” an individual who achieves the highest state of faith. This knight embodies what Kierkegaard calls “infinite resignation,” the readiness to give up all worldly attachments, desires, and even ethical considerations in favor of a divine command. This state of resignation is not a passive relinquishment but an active and conscious sacrifice of one’s personal desires and expectations.
The paradoxical nature of the knight of faith lies in the simultaneous acceptance of loss and the belief in the absurd possibility of regaining what is lost. Kierkegaard uses Abraham as the archetypical knight of faith. Abraham is willing to sacrifice his son Isaac, believing fully in God’s command, yet he also holds onto the hope that he will not lose Isaac. This dual motion of resigning and hoping represents the knight’s existential dance between the finite and the infinite, the possible and the impossible.
Through this lens, Kierkegaard not only questions the nature of true faith but also challenges the reader to reconsider their understanding of faith. The knight of faith’s journey is intensely personal and cannot be mediated by doctrine or communal belief systems. Instead, it is marked by a direct and solitary relationship with the divine, characterized by moments of profound isolation and decision. This existential commitment is what sets the knight apart, navigating the complexities of human existence while anchored in an unwavering trust in the divine.
The Paradox of Faith
The core of Kierkegaard’s exploration in “Fear and Trembling” revolves around the paradox of faith, a theme that is both intriguing and complex. This paradox is vividly illustrated through the biblical story of Abraham, who faces the divine command to sacrifice his son, Isaac. Abraham’s willingness to commit this act, despite its ethical incomprehensibility, highlights the tension between the demands of faith and the dictates of ethics.
According to Kierkegaard, Abraham stands on the threshold of the absurd: he is ready to kill Isaac, trusting that God will not let it happen or will restore Isaac to him. This action suspends the ethical obligations that ordinarily guide human conduct, emphasizing a higher duty directly to God—a duty that transcends human understanding and morality. Kierkegaard terms this the “teleological suspension of the ethical,” where teleology refers to the divine purpose or end that justifies the suspension of ordinary ethical rules.
This paradox challenges conventional views by suggesting that true faith might require one to act against universal ethical norms and personal desires. It brings into question the very nature of morality and faith, pushing the believer to consider whether their deepest commitments are to divine will or to societal norms. In doing so, Kierkegaard does not advocate for irrationality or amorality but rather highlights the complex and often contradictory demands of a life of faith. He invites readers to explore the depths of their own beliefs and the limits they are willing to go to in obedience to those beliefs.
Misinterpretations of Faith
Kierkegaard’s exploration of faith in “Fear and Trembling” not only illuminates its profound depths but also exposes the potential perils of its misinterpretation. One of the critical challenges highlighted by Kierkegaard is the danger of conflating true faith with religious extremism or cult-like behavior. This misinterpretation stems from a misunderstanding of what it means to act on divine command, as demonstrated by Abraham’s readiness to sacrifice Isaac.
In the modern context, such actions, if taken literally without the deep existential and ethical reflections Kierkegaard insists upon, could lead to dangerous outcomes. True faith, as Kierkegaard portrays it, is not blind obedience to perceived divine commands but a complex, reflective, and profoundly personal engagement with the divine. This involves an internal struggle, where the individual must continuously navigate between ethical norms and the demands of faith.
Moreover, Kierkegaard is wary of the potential for religious authority or societal pressure to dictate one’s actions under the guise of faith. He critiques the ways in which religious institutions can co-opt personal faith for their ends, leading to a form of spiritual coercion or manipulation. This is starkly different from the authentic faith journey that Kierkegaard envisions, which is marked by individual autonomy and a personal relationship with the divine, free from external dictates.
The philosopher also points out the risk of “fanaticism,” where individuals might use the guise of religious faith to justify unethical actions. This fanaticism is a perversion of true faith, as it lacks the existential depth and the balance of resignation and hope that Kierkegaard believes are essential in the knight of faith.
Mystical Perspective
Building upon the foundations laid by Kierkegaard, the ideas of Meister Eckhart, a medieval mystic and theologian, offer a complementary perspective on the nature of true faith. Eckhart’s teachings about the “God beyond God” resonate with Kierkegaard’s ideas by pushing the boundaries of conventional religious thought even further.
Eckhart preached that the ultimate encounter with the divine requires an inner transformation where one transcends the commonly held notions of God. This mystical understanding suggests that the God most people worship—the God described in scriptures and preached in churches—is but a preliminary image, not the ineffable and transcendent God that lies beyond human comprehension. For Eckhart, true faith involves a process of “unknowing,” where believers must let go of their preconceived notions and images of God to experience the divine essence in its purest form.
This approach to faith aligns with Kierkegaard’s emphasis on the individual’s personal and direct relationship with the divine, characterized by a journey that goes beyond the ethical and rational structures of society. Eckhart’s mysticism posits that in true faith, one does not simply adhere to doctrinal truths but engages in a deeper, transformative encounter with the divine, which is beyond words and worldly understanding.
The notion that true faith might lead to losing the “worldly” God to find a more profound divine reality challenges believers to reconsider their spiritual commitments. It invites a faith that is not bound by external validations but is an internal, personal experience that radically changes one’s perception of reality and relationship with the divine.
Worldly Constraints
True faith, as explored by both Kierkegaard and Meister Eckhart, offers a path to transcend worldly constraints and pressures, embodying a freedom that goes beyond the ordinary understandings and practices of religion. This form of faith liberates the individual from the dogmas and doctrinal strictures that often define and confine religious life, allowing for a personal and direct encounter with the divine that is both transformative and transcendent.
This freedom is rooted in the existential commitment to the divine that both philosophers describe. For Kierkegaard, this commitment involves the willingness to make the “leap of faith,” a concept where one embraces the absurd and the paradoxical demands of faith, such as Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice his son. This leap is not a blind dive into irrationality but a conscious choice to trust in something beyond rational understanding and ethical norms.
Similarly, Eckhart’s mystical approach encourages believers to detach from their preconceived notions and the worldly definitions of God, urging them to experience the divine in a more immediate and experiential manner. This detachment is not an abandonment of morality but a reorientation towards a higher moral framework that is aligned with the direct and personal experience of God’s presence.
In practical terms, this transcendent approach to faith challenges individuals to live in ways that may conflict with societal expectations or norms. It calls for a life that prioritizes spiritual truths over social conventions, leading to actions and decisions that may seem counterintuitive or radical to those observing from the outside. However, for the individual, such actions are expressions of a deeper truth and commitment.
The freedom offered by true faith is thus a double-edged sword: it empowers profound personal growth and spiritual fulfillment but also demands significant courage to stand apart from societal norms and expectations. It is a journey that requires ongoing reflection, courage, and a deep trust in the personal relationship with the divine.
Fear and Trembling
Our exploration of true faith through the lens of Søren Kierkegaard’s “Fear and Trembling” and Meister Eckhart’s mystical teachings has provided a profound insight into the nature of spiritual belief that transcends conventional religious doctrines. Kierkegaard’s analysis of Abraham’s paradoxical faith and the concept of the knight of faith challenges us to consider the depth of our commitments and the lengths to which we are willing to go in our relationship with the divine.
The discussions on the paradox of faith, the dangers of misinterpreting such deep commitments, and the influence of mystical thought underscore a key theme: true faith is a deeply personal, transformative journey that demands a radical trust in the divine beyond the grasp of human reason and ethics. This faith is not static or conforming but dynamic and challenging, pushing the believer to constantly question and redefine their understanding of the divine and their place in the world.
In contemporary contexts, these ideas remain highly relevant as they offer a critical perspective on the role of faith in a world often dominated by materialism and superficial religious practices. The freedom from worldly constraints that true faith promises offers a beacon for those seeking deeper meaning and purpose in their lives, far from the dogmatic and often divisive rhetoric found in many religious institutions today.
Reflecting on these themes invites us to engage in a personal examination of our beliefs, encouraging a faith that is not only about adherence to external practices but about a profound, internal transformation. It challenges us to live authentically in fear and trembling, embracing the divine mystery with courage and hope.
Image by Leonhard Niederwimmer
Tom’s Blog 